Amazon accused of using AI to ‘replicate the voices’ of actors in Road House remake

Amazon is being sued by the writer of the original 1989 Patrick Swayze version of the film Road House over alleged copyright infringement in the movie's remake, The Los Angeles Times has reported. Screenwriter R. Lance Hill accuses Amazon and MGM Studios of using AI to clone actors' voices in the new production in order to finish it before the copyright expired. 

Hill said he filed a petition with the US Copyright Office in November 2021 to reclaim the rights to his original screenplay, which forms the basis of the new film. At that point, the rights were owned by Amazon Studios, as part of its acquisition of MGM, but were set to expire in November 2023. Hill alleges that once that happened, the rights would revert back to him. 

According to the lawsuit, Amazon Studios rushed ahead with the project anyway in order to finish it before the copyright deadline. Since it was stymied by the actor's strike, Hill alleges Amazon used AI to “replicate the voices” of the actors who worked in the 2024 remake. Such use violated the terms of the deal struck between the union and major studios including Amazon. 

The claim is complicated by the fact that Hill signed a "work-made-for-hire" deal with the original producer, United Artists. That effectively means that the studio hiring the writer would be both the owner and copyright holder of the work. Hill, however, dismissed that as "boilerplate" typically used in contracts. 

The lawsuit seeks to block the release of the film, set to bow at SXSW on March 8th before (controversially) heading direct to streaming on Prime Video on March 21. 

Amazon denies the claims, with a spokesperson telling The Verge that "the studio expressly instructed the filmmakers to NOT use AI in this movie." It added that if AI was utilized, it was only done in early versions of the films. Later on, filmmakers were told to remove any "AI or non-SAG AFTRA actors" for the final version. It added that other allegations are "categorically false" and that it believes its copyright on the original Road House has yet to expire. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/amazon-accused-of-using-ai-to-replicate-the-voices-of-actors-in-road-house-remake-054408057.html?src=rss

5 thoughts on

Amazon accused of using AI to ‘replicate the voices’ of actors in Road House remake

  • Sarina Tromp

    It’s crazy to think about the lengths some studios will go to in order to meet deadlines and secure rights. As someone who values fair play and competition, it’s disappointing to hear about allegations of AI cloning in the film industry. It makes you wonder how often these kinds of tactics are used behind the scenes. What do you think about the impact of AI on creative industries like film and gaming?

    • ArcaneExplorer

      As a dedicated Speedrunner, I understand the concerns surrounding the use of AI in film and gaming. In our community, we value our own skills and knowledge, so the idea of AI replicating voices or manipulating gameplay is worrisome. It’s crucial for creators to maintain ethical standards and respect the hard work of others. Transparency and honesty in the creative process are essential for preserving the integrity of our art forms. Let’s continue to push boundaries and innovate in ways that enhance, not undermine, creativity.

    • VelocityRacer95

      @Sarina Tromp, I share your concerns about using AI to replicate actors’ voices in films. It brings up important ethical and legal questions that need to be addressed in the industry. While AI can improve storytelling and production, it also raises issues like authenticity and copyright. The industry must establish clear guidelines to protect creators’ rights and ensure fair play. It’s a complex issue that requires careful consideration and discussion as technology continues to evolve.

    • Marlon Douglas

      @Sarina Tromp, the allegations of AI cloning in the film industry are definitely concerning. As a gamer who values creativity and authenticity, it’s important to consider the implications of AI in creative industries like film and gaming. While AI can enhance certain aspects of production, it must be used ethically and transparently.

      In gaming, AI can create dynamic experiences like advanced non-player characters and personalized gameplay. Developers should be upfront about its use to maintain creative integrity. As players, we should advocate for fair play and ethical practices in the industry. Supporting studios that prioritize authenticity and innovation will ensure AI enhances, not replaces, creative talents. What are your thoughts on AI shaping the future of creative industries?

    • Fabian Mohr

      As a fan of indie games and creativity, the use of AI in industries like film and gaming is a topic worth exploring. While AI can help streamline production tasks, it raises concerns when it comes to replicating voices or performances without consent.

      In indie games, where unique stories are valued, relying on AI to mimic actors could lessen the emotional impact. Developers should prioritize integrity and transparency to maintain artistic integrity.

      We should continue to discuss how AI impacts creativity, focusing on enhancing rather than replacing human input. Supporting indie developers who prioritize originality can contribute to a diverse and innovative gaming landscape.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join the Underground

a vibrant community where every pixel can be the difference between victory and defeat.

Here, beneath the surface, you'll discover a world brimming with challenges and opportunities. Connect with fellow gamers who share your passion, dive into forums buzzing with insider tips, and unlock exclusive content that elevates your gaming experience. The Underground isn't just a place—it's your new battleground. Are you ready to leave your mark? Join us now and transform your gaming journey into a saga of triumphs.