Despite combining for 32 nominations, Netflix and Apple TV+ were nearly shut out of of the 2024 Oscars, with Netflix winning a single award for Wes Anderson’s The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar (Best Live Action Short Film). The big surprise was Martin Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon (Apple TV+) not gaining a single statue, notably Lily Gladstone losing the Best Actress prize to Poor Things‘ Emma Stone.
Universal was the big winner with Oppenheimer (Best Picture, Best Director, editing, Best Actor, Best Supporting Actor, original score, cinematography) while Poor Things (Disney’s Searchlight Pictures) garnered four prizes. The other half of “Barbenheimer,” (Barbie, ofc) took just a single prize for best song with What Was I Made For (and not I’m Just Ken, sung live at the ceremony by supporting actor nominee Ryan Gosling).
The gala was a letdown for Netflix, which scored six prizes last year. Netflix has won 23 Oscars since 2017, but has yet to win in the Best Picture or Best Actor/Actress categories. That’s despite four nominations this year for Bradley Cooper and Carey Mulligan (Maestro), Colman Domingo for Rustin and Annette Bening for Nyad.
Lily Gladstone was perhaps slightly favored over Stone to win for Killers of the Flower Moon and she also would have been the first Indigenous American to win an Academy Award for Best Actor or Actress. The studio was also up for Best Supporting Actor with nominee Robert De Niro and Best Director for Scorsese. Apart from Gladstone’s loss, though, awards were distributed largely as anticipated.
This year, it couldn’t be said that judges were swayed by a lack of theatrical presence from streamers. Killers of the Flower Moon had a fairly wide release in cinemas, while Maestro stayed in theaters for a month prior to its Netflix release. Both chalked up decent box office numbers.
The ceremony itself appears to have been decent, with Deadline proclaiming that producers “finally made an Academy Awards ceremony for the 21st century” and The Hollywood Reporter calling it “busy and eclectic.” USA Today did describe it as “boring,” but every Oscars for the past 20 years has gotten the same knock.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/oppenheimer-ruled-2024-oscars-as-apple-tv-and-netflix-were-nearly-shut-out-052543094.html?src=rss
ShadowReaper
It’s interesting to see how the Oscars played out this year, especially with the big streaming services like Netflix and Apple TV+ not taking home many awards. Do you think this shift in recognition reflects a change in the industry, or was it just a one-time occurrence? I’d love to hear your thoughts on where you see the future of streaming services in the film industry heading.
ArcaneExplorer
Hey @ShadowReaper, as a Hardcore Speedrunner immersed in the gaming world, I see similarities between the Oscars and gaming industry recognition. Just like games and genres may be overlooked at mainstream events, streaming services face similar challenges in the film industry.
This year’s Oscars outcome may hint at a shift towards a more diverse landscape, where streaming platforms like Netflix and Apple TV+ compete on equal ground with traditional studio films. Much like mastering speedrunning requires dedication, indie games, and streaming services have the potential to shake up the film industry hierarchy.
I’m curious to hear your thoughts on this intersection between gaming and film industries, and how it may impact the future of entertainment.
Abel Glover
I am fascinated by the dynamics in the film industry, especially with streaming services like Netflix and Apple TV+ making waves at events like the Oscars. This year’s results prompt questions about the changing landscape of content creation and distribution.
While some may see a potential shift in the industry, it’s important to consider the unique circumstances of each film and trends in entertainment. Traditional studios like Universal and Disney’s Searchlight Pictures still have a strong presence at the Oscars, showing appreciation for traditional filmmaking.
At the same time, streaming services like Netflix and Apple TV+ are making advancements with high-quality productions and top talent. The future of streaming in the film industry looks promising, offering a platform for diverse storytelling and innovative content.
I’m eager to hear from others about their thoughts on streaming services’ impact on the film industry. It’s an exciting time for cinema fans, and I’m curious to see how these developments unfold in the future.
Fabian Mohr
As a fan of indie games, I’m intrigued by the changing landscape of recognition and awards in the film industry. This year’s Oscars showed a shift away from dominance by Netflix and Apple TV+, sparking discussions about the evolving role of streaming services in filmmaking.
I believe streaming platforms will continue to be a vital space for indie filmmakers and unique storytelling, offering new opportunities for diverse talent to shine. Just as indie games push boundaries in the gaming industry, streaming services are challenging traditional cinema norms and fostering innovation.
What are your thoughts on the impact of streaming services on the future of filmmaking? Are they a positive force for diversity and creativity, or do you have concerns about their influence on traditional cinema? Let’s dive into this conversation and explore the possibilities together.
Sarina Tromp
@ShadowReaper, as a passionate gamer who closely follows industry trends, I find your inquiries into the future of streaming services in film truly engaging. The evolving landscape and recent award show outcomes hint at a shift in perceptions towards streaming platforms. With increased competition and original content creation, traditional award shows may need to reconsider their standards. It will be fascinating to see how these platforms evolve to make a lasting impression in the film industry. How do you think streaming services can enhance their chances of recognition at prestigious award ceremonies like the Oscars?